Alberta Court Finds Society’s By-law Invalid due to Inadequate Approval 

November 2019 Charity & NFP Law Update

The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta released its decision in The Canadian Islamic Trust Foundation v The Muslim Community of Edmonton Mosque and Muslim House on November 13, 2019. The case involved a legal challenge to the valid adoption of the by-law for The Muslim Community of Edmonton Mosque and Muslim House (the “Society”), which was purported to have been adopted by the members at a membership meeting held on March 9, 2014 (“2014 By-law”). In this regard, the Canadian Islamic Trust Foundation (the “Foundation”), a founding organization of the Society with the right to approve amendments to the Society’s by-law (as set out in the Society’s prior existing by-law from 1997), together with individuals associated with the Society, sought a declaration from the court invalidating the 2014 By-law.

The Foundation alleged that there were irregularities in the process to obtain membership approval over the 2014 By-law, including invalid status of the members who had voted to approve the 2014 By-law, as well as alleged irregularities in the process used to call the membership meeting to approve the 2014 By-law. These arguments were unsuccessful, as the court found the Foundation had failed to introduce the necessary evidence to support those arguments. The Foundation also alleged that the 2014 By-law was invalid on the basis that the Foundation’s approval was not provided (as required by its previous by-law from 1997). In this regard, there was no dispute between the parties that the Society’s previous by-laws adopted in 1987 and 1997 were validly enacted.

In response, the Society argued that the Foundation’s approval had been provided by claiming that the Foundation’s approval was granted by an individual named Mr. G. Nabi Chaudhary, who had purported to provide written approval of the 2014 By-law on behalf of the Foundation and on behalf of another organization that had no approval rights of the Society’s by-law. However, the court found that the Society failed to introduce evidence confirming that Mr. Chaudhary had the valid authority to approve the Society’s 2014 By-law on behalf of the Foundation, as the Society failed to demonstrate that Mr. Chaudhary had an official position at the Foundation, and failed to provide information outlining the basis on which Mr. Chaudhary had the valid authority to act as the Foundation’s representative (e.g. that the Foundation had delegated its approval power to him). As a side comment, the court found that the written approval signed by Mr. Chaudhary approving the 2014 By-law lacked the wording confirming the Foundation’s approval over the substantive changes reflected in the 2014 By-law. Instead, the written approval contained wording purporting to approve the “processes” followed by the Society to approve the 2014 By-law, which were irrelevant insofar as the Foundation’s approval of the 2014 By-law was concerned. The court also noted earlier email correspondence was introduced into the evidence which demonstrated the Society’s own belief that the Foundation had not approved the 2014 By-law (contrary to the position taken by the Society before the court).

When adopting new by-laws and by-law amendments, it is essential that charities and not-for-profits fully comply with all requirements set out in their existing by-law, including the requirement to obtain the approval of an external organization over proposed by-law changes, where applicable. All steps taken to comply with the requirements to adopt a new by-law amendment should be carefully documented within the corporate records, in the event of future questions or legal challenge. Failure to comply with one aspect of the by-law approval requirements can invalidate the entire by-law on the basis that all appropriate requirements were not met, as occurred in this case.

Read the November 2019 Charity & NFP Law Update

Recent Developments in IT Law Affecting Charities and NFPs 
CRA News 
-   Update to the Guide for Completing Form T3010 Registered Charity Information Return 
Legislation Update 
-   Ontario Bill 124, Protecting a Sustainable Public Sector for Future Generations Act, 2019, Receives Royal Assent 
-   Schedule 31 of Ontario Bill 100, Protecting What Matters Most Act (Budget Measures), 2019 Proclaimed into Force
-   Ontario Bill 138, Plan to Build Ontario Together Act, 2019 at Second Reading
-   Ontario Bill 136, Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act, 2019, Second Reading Debates
-   Part X of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017 (Ontario) Coming into Force
Corporate Update 
-   Amendments to Nova Scotia's Co-operative Associations Act
-   Proposed Amendments to Ontario's Co-Operative Corporations Act 
CRA Indicates Meals Supplied by Charities to Seniors Are Not Generally Taxable
Alberta Court Finds Society's By-law Invalid due to Inadequate Approval
Ontario Court Reluctant to Intervene in Seminary Board Dispute 
Employee Taking Videos of Customer Results in Termination for Cause
Privacy Law Update 
-   One Year Anniversary - OPC Reviews the First Full Year of Mandatory Data Breach Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements 
-   Canadian Bar Association Submissions on Privacy Act Modernization
Accessibility Compliance Reporting and Accessible Websites Deadlines Approaching 
Ontario Nonprofit Network Publishes Report on Sector Survey
Imagine Canada Publishes Report on Corporate Community Contributions 
The 26th Annual Church & Charity Law Seminar November 7, 2019
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Click to Subscribe

Newsletter Archive

Carters Professional Corporation

Orangeville Office
211 Broadway, PO Box 440
Orangeville, Ontario, Canada
L9W 1K4
Tel: (519) 942-0001
Fax: (519) 942-0300
Toll Free: 1-877-942-0001

Ottawa Office
117 Centrepointe Drive, Suite 350
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K2G 5X3
Tel: (613) 235-4774
Fax: (613) 235-9838
Toll Free: 1-866-388-9596

Toronto Office
67 Yonge Street, Suite 1402
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5E 1J8
Tel: (416) 594-1616
Fax: (416) 594-1209
Toll Free: 1-877-942-0001