Ontario Court Confirms Church Property Used for Religious School Exempt from Municipal Property Tax

In St. George and St. Rueiss Coptic Orthodox Church v Municipal Property Assessment Corp., the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario found that property owned by a Coptic Orthodox Church (“Church”), and shared with a charitable religious school (“School”), was exempt from property tax under the Assessment Act (Ontario) (the “Act”). The Court noted that while both the Church and the School were separately incorporated charities (the Court stated that the Church had incorporated the School for insurance and liability reasons), the Church controlled and dominated the School and the operation of the School was an important part of the Church’s religious activities.

For the balance of the Bulletin, please see Charity & NFP Law Bulletin No. 382.

February 2016 Charity & NFP Law Update

Ontario OCA Corporations Going Federal: Issues to Consider
CRA News
Testamentary Charitable Giving – The New Regime
Ontario Court Recognizes New Invasion of Privacy Tort
Discriminatory Will Provision Ruled Invalid
Ontario Human Rights Commission Updates Policy on Creed
FCA Revokes Charitable Status Based on Failure to Maintain Proper Books and Records
CRA Views: Non-Resident Donors Required to File a Tax Return
CRA Views: No Change in CRA’s Position on Public Bodies as Qualified Donees
BC New Societies Act Coming Into Force on November 28, 2016
Claim of Breach of Fiduciary Duty Struck in Class Action Against University
Tax Preparers Convicted of Fraud in BC Court
CRTC Issues Second Warrant Under CASL
ONN Submission Focuses on “Nonprofit Social Enterprise”
FATF Plenary Meeting Held this Month
Giving Australia 2015-2016 Project
Ottawa Region Charity & Not-for-Profit Law Seminar Materials Available


February 2016 Charity & NFP Law Update

Ontario OCA Corporations Going Federal: Issues to Consider

Charity & NFP Law Bulletin No. 379, February 25, 2016

As a result of the repeated delay in the proclamation of the Ontario Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 (“ONCA”), some Ontario not-for-profit corporations under Part III of the Corporations Act (“OCA”) are considering whether to give up waiting for the proclamation of the ONCA by continuing under the federal Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (“CNCA”). The CNCA was enacted in 2009 and proclaimed on October 17, 2011. Is it suitable for an OCA corporation to do so?

Ever since the enactment of the ONCA in 2010, OCA corporations have been waiting for the proclamation of the ONCA. The Ontario Ministry of Government and Consumer Services announced on September 17, 2015, that the ONCA will not come into effect for at least another two years until two things have happened: (a) the Legislature has passed technical amendments to the ONCA and related legislation; and (b) technology at the Ministry is upgraded to support these changes and improve service delivery. Once the ONCA is proclaimed, existing OCA corporations will have three years to transition under the ONCA.

Ontario not-for-profit corporations have been left in corporate limbo for six years since 2010, having to make the difficult decision whether to update their objects and by-laws to further their mission or to wait for the proclamation of the ONCA before making those changes. The problem with waiting is that they do not know how long the wait might be. On the other hand, the problem with updating the objects and by-laws first is that those updates would have to be made under the rules in the OCA and they may have to be updated again after proclamation to comply with the new rules in the ONCA. The question is whether continuing into the CNCA is a suitable solution to avoid these difficulties.

Another issue to consider is whether it would be desirable for OCA corporations to move into the federal jurisdiction for other reasons. This question is worth asking since this option was not available under the Canada Corporations Act, the predecessor to the CNCA, which did not permit corporations from another jurisdiction to continue under the Act.

For the balance of this Bulletin, please see Charity & NFP Law Bulletin No. 379.

Ontario Human Rights Commission Updates Policy On Creed

Charity & NFP Law Bulletin No. 378, February 25, 2016

On December 10, 2015, the Ontario Human Rights Commission (the “OHRC”) announced the release of an update to its Policy on preventing discrimination based on creed (the “Policy”). The updated Policy, which replaces the previous policy on creed from 1996, surveys current and historical trends and issues that have shaped discrimination based on creed and introduces an expanded definition of creed. This expanded definition of creed leaves open the possible inclusion of non-religious belief systems that substantially influences a person’s identity, world view, and way of life. The Policy also provides a range of specific situations in which accommodation may be required based on creed and how they may be accommodated.

For the balance of this Bulletin, please see Charity & NFP Law Bulletin No. 378.