A. INTRODUCTION
On July 26, 2012, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) released
Guidance CG-014, Community Economic Development Activities and Charitable
Registration (the New Guidance). The New Guidance replaces Guide RC4143, Registered Charities: Community
Economic Development Programs, which had been available from CRA since
December 23, 1999 (Former Guidance). The New Guidance provides parameters in
which registered charities may conduct “community economic development” (CED)
activities that “improv[e] economic opportunities and social conditions of an
identified community.”
The New Guidance is a welcome improvement over the Former
Guidance, expanding the types of CED activities that charities may engage in,
especially in the area of program-related investments. This Charity Law
Bulletin reviews key features of the New Guidance, noting the restraints
placed on various forms of CED activities identified in the New Guidance, and
how the new guidelines differ from the guidelines contained in the Former
Guidance.
B. WHAT IS CED?
CRA recognizes that CED refers to a wide variety of
activities. For purposes of the New Guidance, CED activities are often also
referred to by the following terms: “community capacity building”, “social
enterprise”, and “social finance”. The New Guidance acknowledges that CRA does
not have official definitions for theses terms and CRA recognizes that there
are no universally accepted definitions either. Nevertheless, definitions for these terms are contained in Appendix A to the
New Guidance, which states that these definitions “may be helpful to readers
interested in considering the concepts further” and that they are “provided for
reference only and will not be used as determining factors in any registration
or auditing processes.” The New Guidance further states that “regardless of how
an activity is labelled, it will only be charitable if it directly furthers a
charitable purpose.” (see the next section of this Bulletin in relation to
discussion on CED activities furthering a charitable purpose).
There are a few issues that the charitable sector and
practitioners will need to note in this regard: (a) The mere fact that an activity
is for a social good and is referred to as a social enterprise or social
finance, or benefits community capacity building, does not necessarily mean
that the activity is charitable. (b) These definitions must be reviewed in
light of the circumstances involved in each activity and therefore they are not
definitive parameters when determining whether an activity is charitable. (c) Since
CRA recognizes that these definitions are for reference purposes only and are
not determinative criteria to be applied by CRA on an audit, a lack of clarity of
what CED means may make it difficult for charities to determine what activities
would or would not be acceptable by CRA.
CRA recognizes that, in general, “many” CED activities
involve “improving economic opportunities and social conditions of an
identified community. In this regard, CRA accepts that a community can be
defined in two differ manners: (1) geographically; or (2) an identified group
of eligible beneficiaries who share a common characteristic that results in an
economic disadvantage. The New Guidance indicates that it is also possible for
a community to involve both factors (such as an identified group of eligible
beneficiaries in a particular geographical area).
C. BASIS AT LAW FOR CED ACTIVITIES
The New Guidance points out that the law in Canada does
not recognize CED in and of itself to be a charitable purpose. Therefore, in
order to be considered “charitable”, CED activities must directly further a
charitable purpose. In this regard, the New Guidance states that CED activities may potentially
further the following heads of charitable purposes, namely relief of poverty,
advancement of education and benefit the community in other ways the law
regards as charitable. It would therefore imply (although not explicitly stated in the New Guidance) a
CED activity cannot be conducted for the advancement of religion. Therefore,
for religious charities that want to engage in social programs, they would need
to carefully review whether those programs are within the parameters of
practical manifestation of their faith or whether the programs are within the
ambit of CED activities. In the latter scenario, it would be important for
religious charities to understand that if they want to engage in CED
activities, those activities must be conducted to further one of the other
three heads of charitable purposes. This would in turn mean that those
religious charities may need to carefully review the objects/purposes in their
constating documents by which they are established to determine whether they
have the necessary objects/purposes to engage in CED activities.
As well, the New Guidance states that each charitable
purpose has specific requirements in relation to “eligible beneficiaries”. To
illustrate what this means, examples were given in the New Guidance, such as for
a purpose that relieves poverty, eligible beneficiaries must be poor; for a
purpose that relieves conditions associated with disability, eligible
beneficiaries are individuals with conditions associated with the disability,
etc. Also, to be charitable, the New Guidance states that CED activities must meet
the “public benefit test”, which includes not providing any private benefit
that is more than incidental. This means any private benefit must be necessary,
reasonable, and not disproportionate to the public benefit. In addition, each form of CED has specific restrictions that a charity must
adhere to in order to be charitable.
D. AREAS OF CED ACTIVITIES
The New Guidance states that CED activities “generally”
fall into the following five categories: activities that relieve unemployment;
grants and loans; program-related investments; social businesses for
individuals with disabilities; and community land trusts. This means that it is possible for a CED activity to fall outside these
enumerated areas, although this is not specifically stated in the New Guidance.
As well, the New Guidance states that CED activities can be charitable when
they promote commerce or industry as a whole for the public benefit, and not in
advancing the interests of members of a particular industry. The New Guidance also sets out parameters for CED activities that
improve socio-economic conditions for the public benefit in an area of social
and economic deprivation. A brief commentary on each of these areas is set out below.
E. ACTIVITIES THAT RELIEVE UNEMPLOYMENT
In comparison with the Former Guidance, the New Guidance
provides a much more streamlined and succinct set of guidelines on CED
activities that relieve unemployment.
Neither “providing employment” nor “helping people find
employment” are charitable activities if the beneficiary group is the general
public according to the New Guidance. Activities that relieve unemployment or underemployment are only charitable if
they directly further one or more of the three recognized charitable purposes
(but not advancement of religion) as explained above. For example, providing career counseling to people who are unemployed and
living in poverty is a charitable purpose.
As well, CED activities that relieve unemployment can be
charitable only if the beneficiary group consists of individuals who are
unemployed or facing a real prospect of imminent unemployment and are shown to
need assistance (i.e., unemployed persons who do not have the resources
or skills to help themselves). In other words, the beneficiary group must contain exclusively persons who are
eligible beneficiaries, and cannot potentially include those who are not. This general guideline is much more helpful than the position in the Former
Guidance, which restricted CED employment programs to helping “hard-to-employ”
individuals who meet a list of 9 criteria set out in the Former Guidance
(including have been out of the labour force for over a year; have completed
high school or post-secondary education and not found employment within a year;
have not completed high school; are over age 45; or have a previous criminal
conviction; etc.).
In order to pass the public benefit test, care must be
taken to ensure that private benefits that are more than incidental are
provided to others. For example, it is not charitable if the emphasis is on
helping employers recruit employees rather than helping beneficiaries find
employment.
A list of helpful examples of CED activities that relieve unemployment
is set out in the New Guidance. The New Guidance also provides further guidelines in relation to one of the
examples, i.e., employment-related training program. In general, employment
related training, such as computer skills instruction, must not be limited to
specific employers because this could offer an unacceptable private benefit to
the employer. Exceptions are available for employment programs conducted in
areas of “social economic deprivation” (see further commentary below).
Examples of employment-related training include (1) employability
training: developing the skills necessary to prepare for employment (such as
English or French as a second language), as well as life skills (such as time
management and interpersonal relations); (2) entrepreneurial training:
providing instruction on preparing a business plan, obtaining financing,
bookkeeping, preparing financial statements, marketing, and government
regulations; and (3) on-the-job training: providing on-the-job training in
vocational or work skills that enhance an individual’s employability. The description and requirements for all three types of programs are generally
the same as CRA’s Former Guidance. The third type of activity is referred to as
“training businesses” in the Former Guidance. As well, the New Guidance states
that the focus of on-the-job training programs must be providing training to
the eligible beneficiaries employed by the charity, not jobs. The New Guidance
also sets out a number of characteristics that are expected for this type of
program. Although it is possible for a charity to generate incidental profits from the
program, it cannot be the focus of the program. An activity that does not meet
the above requirements may be recognized by CRA to be an unrelated business, an
activity that charities are prohibited from conducting.
F. GRANTS TO BENEFICIARIES - INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNTS
There are two types of CED activities in
relation to making grants and loans to eligible beneficiaries, and the first
type is individual development accounts (IDAs). IDAs are also permitted under
the Former Guidance, except that expanded parameters are permitted under the
New Guidance.
An IDA is a savings account that is
intended to help an eligible beneficiary to save funds for a specific
goal. For every dollar saved by the eligible beneficiary, the charity may make
a matching grant at a pre-determined ratio over a specific period of time. For
example, a charity and a disabled beneficiary may agree that the charity will
deposit two dollars for every dollar that the beneficiary deposits until they
have enough money to convert the beneficiary’s basement into a home office.
Under the Former Guidance, the charity is restricted to making contributions
over two to three years, which appears to be expanded under the New Guidance to
“a specific period of time”, meaning that it could potentially be longer than
three years. While under the New Guidance, CRA recognizes that not only can
IDAs be used to relive poverty (such as by relieving unemployment of the poor),
IDAs may also be used for other charitable purposes (such as advancing
education by providing employment-related training, or furthering a fourth
category purpose (such as helping a disabled individual modify his or her home
in order to operate a home-based business). This is a welcome expansion of what charities can use IDAs for, because under
the Former Guidance, charities could use IDAs only for the purpose of helping
low-income beneficiaries.
The New Guidance imposes a new requirement that a charity
engaging in an IDA must be able to provide a “policy” showing the criteria used
to determine eligibility of an eligible beneficiary, how the amount of an IDA
is determined, the acceptable uses of the IDA, and when the eligibility of the
beneficiary ceases. In order to pass the public benefit test, the charity must
be able to show that it only grants the amount necessary to achieve the
charitable purpose. As well, CRA also requires the charity to limit the grants
to what is needed to achieve this purpose. Although not explicitly stated in the New Guidance, it would go without saying
that the charity would also need to ensure that the policy is implemented and
provide supporting books and records to evidence the implementation.
G. LOANS AND LOAN GUARANTEES TO BENEFICIARIES
The second type of CED activities in
relation to making grants and loans is the giving of loans and loan guarantees
to eligible beneficiary.
The ability of charities to provide loans, micro-loans and
loan guarantees is expanded under the New Guidance, as compared to the
restrictions under the Former Guidance. Under the Former Guidance, charities
can provide loans and loan guarantees only for the purposes of reliving poverty,
whereas under the New Guidance it is possible to operate these programs to
advance education or other purposes that benefit the community. For example,
the New Guidance states that a loan guarantee to an eligible beneficiary to
help him or her attend courses to enhance their employment-related skills can
be charitable.
It should be noted that the Former Guidance indicated that
a charity conducting such CED activities should be able to provide a policy
concerning when the charity considers that a recipient of support services or
loans is a viable business and is no longer in need of such support. While the
New Guidance reiterates this requirement, it also requires that the policy
include criteria for determining who the eligible beneficiaries are for such
start up loans and to provide a rationale and justification to show that its loans or
guarantees do not exceed the amount needed to achieve its charitable purpose.
The New Guidance explains when start-up loans and loan
guarantees are acceptable and when they are not. It states that providing start-up
loans and loan guarantees to establish businesses (including sole
proprietorships or collective enterprises such as worker cooperatives) can be
charitable if they directly further a charitable purpose. This type of activity
also typically involves entrepreneurial training. On the other hand, the New
Guidance specifically points out that providing loans, start-up loans, and loan
guarantees to promote entrepreneurship (such as to help entrepreneurs bring new
and innovative ideas to the marketplace, or to promote business development) is
generally not a charitable activity because the private benefit
conferred is not incidental.
Specifically, CRA took the position under the Former
Guidance that loans that exceeded $25,000 or were consistently larger than $10,000
suggested crossing the threshold between a charitable activity and a private
benefit. The New Guidance appears to relax this rule somewhat by stating that
while loans less than $10,000 will generally be considered to be a sufficient
amount needed to achieve a charitable purpose, it also notes that the
determination will be fact-based in each case, suggesting a higher loan amount
may be permitted if it is necessary to achieve the charitable purpose.
The New Guidance states that interest rates are generally expected
to be at or below fair market value to
allow greater charitable benefit to be delivered. However, CRA also accepts there
may be circumstances when a higher rate is justified, such as where the terms
allow the borrower to delay repayment and therefore flexibility may be as
important a factor to some borrowers as the interest rate. As well, CRA accepts
that a charity may generally justify charging an interest rate that covers, but
does not exceed, its own borrowing rate and administrative costs, plus a
loan-loss provision that is supported by the charity’s actual loan-loss
experience. As well, new charities can rely on the loan-loss experience of
charities that operate similar programs. Under the Former Guidance, an interest rate that yields a surplus may call into
question whether or not the charitable purpose of the charity is being achieved
by having a higher interest. CRA’s expanded policy in
the New Guidance is a welcome change.
Interestingly, there is no mention about
community loan funds in the New Guidance, whereas there are a few paragraphs in
the Former Guidance on this type of programs. The Former Guidance provides that
community loan funds, themselves operating a micro-enterprise program or
lending money to charities operating such a program, was charitable. As well,
the Former Guidance states that community loan funds lending money to
non-qualified donees must qualify either as “straight investments” or the
recipient non-qualified donee must be under contract to conduct a charitable
program on behalf of the lending charity. The lack of any mention of this type
of program in the New Guidance leaves the CRA’s position on this matter
unclear. As well, the previous requirement that community loan funds that were
involved in lending money to non-qualified donees must qualify as “straight
investments” would presumably no longer apply in light of the new parameters
that charities may engage in program-related investments (see next section
below).
H. PROGRAM-RELATED INVESTMENTS
One of the most significant expansions of CRA’s policy set
out in the New Guidance is the broader context in which registered charities
may engage in program-related investments (PRIs). Under the Former Guidance,
charities were only permitted to engage in PRIs if made to qualified donees.
However, under the New Guidance, CRA now accepts that charities can engage in
PRIs that involve loans, loan guarantees, share purchase and leases of land or
buildings involving non-qualified donees as well, as long as they operate
within the parameters set out in the New Guidance. This shift in CRA’s policy
is a welcome change.
A PRI is not an investment in the conventional financial
sense because while PRIs may generate a financial return, they are not made for
that reason. As such, a PRI is not required to generate a return, or potential
return, of capital (funds or property) for the charity, or to yield additional
revenue (such as interest) for the charity at or above market rate.
The New Guidance stipulates that, when making a PRI in a
non-qualified donee the PRI must be used for a program over which the investor
charity maintains ongoing direction and control, so that the program is the investor
charity’s own activity (i.e., this is the same as the “own activity”
test that must be met when charities conduct activities through third party
intermediaries); and the investor charity must show that any private benefit resulting from the PRI is incidental (necessary, reasonable, and not
disproportionate to the resulting public benefit). This would mean that on the flip side, if a charity cannot maintain direction
and control over the activity carried out by a non-qualified donee, it could
invest in, or provide resources to, the non-qualified donee at market rates (as
a form of conventional financial investment) provided the investment meets the
investor charity’s conventional investment requirements.
In general, a PRI is an activity that furthers its
charitable purpose and the New Guidance identifies four common types of PRIs:
loans, loan guarantees, share purchases, and leases of land or buildings.
(a) A charity may make a PRI in the form of a loan or loan
guarantee similar to the policy regarding charities making loans as explained
above. PRIs that are loans are expected to be at or below fair market interest
rates so that greater charitable benefits can be delivered, although there may
be circumstances under which a higher interest rate may be justified (such as
by including other terms that would allow the borrower to delay repayment). A charity
may also make a PRI in the form of a loan guarantee to help another
organization to obtain a loan. The guarantee must be for a loan that will
further the investor charity’s charitable purposes.
(b) A charitable organization may make a PRI in the form
of share purchases. A public or private charitable foundation can also make a
PRI in this form, but neither can acquire a controlling interest in a company.
Also, if a private foundation acquires more than 20% of any class of shares in
a company, it might trigger divestment obligations and sanctions, including
revocation of its charitable status. Other legal limitations may apply to all
charities because of the provisions in provincial and territorial legislation.
(c) A charity can also engage in PRIs in the form of
leasing land and buildings. The New Guidance does not provide much guidelines
in relation to this form of PRI. To illustrate what it means, the New Guidance
does give the following example:
A charity that has a purpose to advance
education leases a building to an arm’s length organization (a non-qualified
donee) at less than fair market value. The arm’s length organization teaches
English or French as a second language to help students develop the skills
necessary to prepare for employment. The lease agreement between the charity
and the arm’s length organization states that all students have to meet the
investor charity’s appropriate eligibility criteria. The terms of the agreement
include ongoing monitoring and reporting provisions to ensure the charity
maintains the necessary direction and control over its activity, which is to
teach eligible beneficiaries the language skills necessary to prepare them for
employment.
The New Guidance points out that there are limitations in
how a private foundation may be restricted in engaging some forms of PRIs. For
example, private foundations cannot engage in any business activities, and
therefore any PRIs that result in the generation of business income may put the
charity off-side with the rules. As well, any private foundation that engages
in PRIs in the form of a share purchase must ensure compliance with the
reporting and divestiture requirements of the excess business holding rules.
The New Guidance requires charities that conduct PRIs to
have appropriate exit mechanisms in place to withdraw from a PRI or convert it
to a regular investment. The charity should also have a written policy or other
documentation that explains how each PRI furthers its charitable purpose and
stipulates the criteria it applies to PRI decisions. If the charity makes a PRI
to a non-qualified donee, the charity should maintain books and records evidencing
direction and control over the activities. Also, the charity must ensure that
its PRIs meet all applicable trust, corporate, or other legal or regulatory
requirements.
It is also important to note that the New Guidance
recognizes that a specialized intermediary, i.e., a non-qualified donee,
may potentially qualify for registration as a charity on the basis that it is
promoting the efficiency and effectiveness of charities. For example, a
property management organization may be a specialized intermediary qualifying
for registration as a registered charity on the basis that it manages only
low-income housing properties which are owned by registered charities.
I. ACCOUNTING FOR LOANS AND PRIs
Charities that engage in loan, loan guarantees and PRIs
must be careful to ensure that the assets utilized in these programs are
properly accounted for in their financial statements and annual T3010
information returns. In this regard, the assets that have been loaned or used
in making PRIs (i.e., loans, loan guarantees, share purchase and leases)
must be included in a charity’s T3010 return, either as part of its total
assets or accounts receivable. Similarly, all interests and other income generated from a charity’s loan or
PRI activities must also be reported in the T3010.
The assets of a charity used in making a loan or PRIs
would not be included in the assets base for the purpose of calculating the
charity’s 3.5% disbursement quota obligations requirements. This would make
sense because these assets are used in achieving their charitable purposes and
therefore the assets are used in the course of the charities’ charitable
activities. However, if a portion of any loan is held by the loan recipient for future use,
that portion has to be reported as “property not used in charitable activities”,
and therefore would be included in the asset base when calculating the 3.5%
disbursement quota obligation.
If an investor charity is unable to recover part or all of
the principal of a loan, the unrecovered amount is a charitable or other
expenditure of the investor charity, depending on the purpose of the loan. In
this scenario, this part of the loan can be used to meet its disbursement
quota.
A PRI in the form of a loan guarantee is cost-neutral. It
is not a debt at the time the loan is guaranteed. If the borrower defaults on
the loan, and the charity has to honour the guarantee, the charity will be
considered to have incurred a debt. Once the debt has been incurred, the
charity has to report the debt as a liability. Any principal and interest paid
can be reported as a charitable or other type of expenditure, as applicable.
However, loans, loan guarantees and PRIs are not
recognized as charitable disbursements and cannot be used in meeting the
charity’s 3.5% disbursement quota. If, and only if, a charity fails to meet its
disbursement quota requirement and the charity has made a loan or a PRI (in the
form of a loan, a share purchase, or a lease), then CRA may consider any
opportunity cost resulting from these activities as equivalent to an
expenditure. Specifically, the opportunity costs of PRIs are calculated as
follows:
· Loans: the outstanding loan multiplied by the difference between
the interest rate the investor charity could have earned if it invested the
amount in T bills or GICs, and the interest rate the charity received.
· Share purchase: the difference between the return the investor
charity could have realized had it invested in T bills or GICs and the actual
return or loss from purchasing shares.
· Lease: the difference between the fair market value of the lease
and the actual amount the investor charity received from the lease.
It is difficult to understand the rationale for not
permitting these expenditures as charitable disbursements for the purpose of
meeting the disbursement quota obligation. This position would act as a
deterrent for a charity to give loans or engage in PRIs and would encourage the
charity to find an alternative way to fund the program (such as a direct
charitable program). It appears that this position is premised on CRA’s view
(though not clear from the New Guidance) that they are not used “directly” on
charitable work. If CRA accepts that a charity engaging in loans and PRIs must
do so in furtherance of the charity’s charitable purposes, then assets used as
such should qualify to be included as charitable disbursements in meeting its
disbursement quota. As well, if these expenditures are not charitable
disbursements, it would be difficult to understand why lost opportunity costs
associated with these disbursements may be considered to be counted towards
meeting the charity’s disbursement quota only if the charity has a problem
meeting its disbursement quota.
J. SOCIAL BUSINESSES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
Charities may operate social businesses that employ people
with disabilities. The Former Guidance refers to this type of activities as
“sheltered workshops”. In this regard, “disability” means any previous or
existing mental or physical disability and includes disfigurement and previous
or existing dependence on alcohol or a drug. Social businesses may provide
services, sell goods, manufacture articles, or undertake other kinds of work.
It may also operate a retail outlet or send products manufactured to be sold at
stores. Unlike on-the-job training, social businesses may provide permanent
employment.
A social business is required to have the following
characteristics: (a) the workforce must consist entirely of individuals with
disabilities, with the exception of employees who provide necessary training
and supervision; and (b) the work is specifically chosen and structured to take
into account the special needs of individuals with disabilities and to relieve
conditions associated with those disabilities. As well, the following
characteristics are generally expected but are not required: (a) provision of associated
job-related training that enhances the general skills of the eligible
beneficiaries; and (b) having significant involvement of eligible beneficiaries
in managing and making decisions. As with on-the-job training, the CRA does not
prohibit a social business from earning a profit, as long as the focus is on
helping eligible beneficiaries.
K. COMMUNITY LAND TRUSTS
Community land trusts ensure that land will remain
available for the benefit of a community. Typically, community land trusts
operate by developing properties and leasing them to eligible beneficiaries.
Operating a community land trust may be a charitable activity if it directly
furthers a head of charity.
L. PROMOTION OF COMMERCE OR INDUSTRY
CED activities that promote commerce or industry can be
charitable by benefiting the public or a sufficient section of the public and
not a specific eligible beneficiary The New Guidance states that these
activities may promote a particular industry or trade, as long as they focus on
benefiting the public, not the members of the industry. In this regard, the New
Guidance includes examples of purposes that could enhance an industry
while also potentially delivering a charitable public benefit, which were not
included in the Former Guidance: “promote greater efficiencies within an
industry, if those efficiencies benefit the general public”, or “promote and
facilitate the achievement, preservation and maintenance of high standards of
practice within an industry, if doing so benefits the general public.” Activities
that could further these purposes and result in a tangible benefit were also
given in both the Former Guidance and the New Guidance.
The New Guidance also indicates that for organizations
conducting activities that promote commerce or industry wishing to apply for
charitable status, non-expert opinion from the founders, directors, trustees,
members or supporters of an organization are not relevant when determining
whether a benefit to the public will result from promoting an industry. As
well, an expression of non-expert opinion or belief, or merely stating that a
public benefit will result from a purpose, is not enough. In this regard, it
would be best to obtain independent and object expert opinions on the matter
before applying for registration.
M. CED ACTIVITIES IN AREAS OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEPRIVATION
The New Guidance states that CED activities may be
charitable if they improve socio-economic conditions for the public benefit in
an area of social and economic deprivation (which are also known as deprived
areas). In this regard, this type of activity is referred in the Former
Guidance as “economically challenged communities”.
The New Guidance provides that deprived areas are
geographic communities that generally display high rates (at least 1.5 times
the national average) of a number of characteristics for four consecutive
years. The list of characteristics is very similar to the list in Former
Guidance. In general, the characteristics include: unemployment for two or more
consecutive years; crime (including family violence); health problems (including
mental health issues, drug and alcohol addiction, and suicide); and children
and youth at risk (taken into care or dropping out of school). As well, the
deprived area must be large enough for the beneficiaries to form a sufficient
segment of the public. If a deprived areas no longer display any of the
characteristics set out above, it no longer qualifies as a deprived area and
the charity will have two years to wind up its CED activities in the area.
N. CONCLUSION
The New Guidance takes a number of positive steps to
facilitate charities engaging in CED programs. In particular, charities no
longer have to ensure they do not make a profit from activities to relieve
unemployment or social businesses, as long as this is not the focus or goal of
the activities. As well, charities looking to make PRIs can now do so in
non-qualified donees. However, it is unfortunate that the entire amount of a
PRI still does not count towards meeting a charity’s disbursement quota and the
lost opportunity costs associated with these disbursements may only count
towards meeting the charity’s disbursement quota if the charity has a problem
meeting its disbursement quota.
The New Guidance specifically requires charities engaging
in CED activities to adopt and implement policies in support of the activities
to ensure that they are charitable, and to keep sufficient books and records to
evidence compliance of CRA’s requirements. As well, it would be prudent for
directors and trustees to be reviewing their governing documents to ensure that
CED activities are achieving the charitable purposes of their organization. Since
the New Guidance sets out a number of new requirements on CED activities and
there is no grandfathering of activities that are currently undertaken under
the Former Guidance, it is important for all charities are that engaging in CED
activities to carefully review their programs and to make necessary changes in
order to ensure compliance with these new requirements.
Lastly, although the New Guidance expands the parameters
within which charities may engage in CED activities, the ability of private
foundations to take advantage of these new expanded requirements are limited
because of the rules under the Income Tax Act that apply to private
foundations (such as private foundations cannot engage in any business
activities, and must comply with the excess business holdings rules). As such,
private foundations that conduct CED activities would need to carefully review
all of its CED programs to ensure that they are not off-side with these rules.